<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why You Should Build A Team..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradingmalaysia.com/2007/04/19/why-you-should-build-a-team-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradingmalaysia.com/2007/04/19/why-you-should-build-a-team-2/</link>
	<description>Asset Management and Trading Education for the KLSE</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dirtydog</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingmalaysia.com/2007/04/19/why-you-should-build-a-team-2/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtydog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingmalaysia.com/?p=419#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I have written a bit in my latest post why I have decided to appoint a manager for my fundamental (or "mechanical") portfolio. These are easy and objective to set up, evaluate, and monitor. Speculative (or "discretionary") portfolios, however, are not.

I hope that you can also see why if you were a trader you would always want to develop and own a successful speculative system and not have it in the hands of another. Whilst I agree that outsourcing my discretionary portfolio will probably be more efficient from a time saving perspective, I have to consider that in making the allocations efficient .To apply an analogy, if you ran a successful car company you would not outsource the car design processes and keep the mailroom department. It would be the other way round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written a bit in my latest post why I have decided to appoint a manager for my fundamental (or &#8220;mechanical&#8221;) portfolio. These are easy and objective to set up, evaluate, and monitor. Speculative (or &#8220;discretionary&#8221;) portfolios, however, are not.</p>
<p>I hope that you can also see why if you were a trader you would always want to develop and own a successful speculative system and not have it in the hands of another. Whilst I agree that outsourcing my discretionary portfolio will probably be more efficient from a time saving perspective, I have to consider that in making the allocations efficient .To apply an analogy, if you ran a successful car company you would not outsource the car design processes and keep the mailroom department. It would be the other way round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swifz</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingmalaysia.com/2007/04/19/why-you-should-build-a-team-2/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>swifz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingmalaysia.com/?p=419#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Why hire a manager to invest in fundamental and play speculative yourself? What I know is for fundamental, the time frame is long, thus it will require less attention. For speculative, you need to constantly monitor your position. So, I don't understand your action when you claim you don't have enough time.

Better hire a manager to play speculative and you yourself fundamental, unless you are looking for the thrill of speculating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why hire a manager to invest in fundamental and play speculative yourself? What I know is for fundamental, the time frame is long, thus it will require less attention. For speculative, you need to constantly monitor your position. So, I don&#8217;t understand your action when you claim you don&#8217;t have enough time.</p>
<p>Better hire a manager to play speculative and you yourself fundamental, unless you are looking for the thrill of speculating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
